ixBrowser
Forever-free, but no GPU masking.
Last updated
Some links are affiliate linksPros
- Forever-free tier with unlimited total profiles
- Cloud storage and team work included even for free users
- Inexpensive paid tiers (up to ~$19.99/mo)
- Custom fingerprints and proxy integration
- Beginner-friendly positioning
Cons
- No GPU masking — a meaningful gap in the fingerprint surface
- Incomplete masking can hurt automation reliability
- 10-per-day cap on new profile creations on the free plan
- Younger and less mature than established competitors
ixBrowser review — free and approachable, with notable gaps
TL;DR
ixBrowser positions itself as a forever-free anti-detect browser, offering unlimited total profiles (capped at 10 new creations per day) plus cloud storage and team features at no cost. It is approachable and cheap, with paid tiers topping out near $19.99/month. The catch is incomplete masking — notably no GPU masking — which undermines its stealth and the reliability of any automation built on top of it.
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Profiles | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | $0 | Unlimited total | 10 new creations/day; cloud storage and team work included |
| Paid | up to ~$19.99/mo | Unlimited total | Removes daily creation limit, adds features |
Prices verified June 2026 — confirm on the official site.
How ixBrowser scores on our criteria
1. Fingerprint masking quality — 5/10 (weight 20%)
ixBrowser spoofs Canvas, WebGL, fonts, timezone and similar attributes, which covers the common bases. However, it does not mask everything — most notably there is no GPU masking. That gap leaves an identifiable surface that more thorough detection systems can use, and it is the main reason ixBrowser sits lower in our rankings despite its accessible feature set.
2. Pricing & value — 7/10 (15%)
The pricing is friendly: a usable free tier and paid plans up to roughly $19.99/month. For the money it offers a lot of surface area, though the value proposition is dented by the masking gaps that affect how dependable the stealth actually is.
3. Free plan & trial — 7/10 (10%)
The free plan is genuinely generous on paper — unlimited total profiles plus cloud storage and team features. The practical limit is the cap of 10 new profile creations per day, which throttles anyone trying to spin up many accounts quickly.
4. Profiles & management — 7/10 (10%)
Profile management is straightforward and includes cloud storage, so profiles aren’t tied to a single machine. The daily creation cap on the free tier is the main friction point for heavier users.
5. Automation & API — 5/10 (10%)
Automation and an API do exist, so scripted workflows are possible, but the experience is limited and clunky to work with. Crucially, the incomplete fingerprint masking — the missing GPU layer in particular — can undermine the reliability of automated sessions, since a detectable fingerprint is a weak foundation for any automation.
6. Team collaboration — 6/10 (7%)
Team work is included even on the free plan, which is a genuine plus for small groups coordinating accounts. The depth of roles and permissions is modest compared with agency-grade tools.
7. Proxy & network — 7/10 (8%)
Proxy integration is built in and works as expected for assigning network identities per profile, which is essential for the multi-accounting use cases ixBrowser targets.
8. Cloud & mobile profiles — 6/10 (5%)
Cloud profile storage is a strength here, keeping profiles portable across machines. Mobile profile support is less of a focus.
9. Usability & UI — 7/10 (8%)
The product is aimed at beginners and budget users, and the interface is correspondingly approachable. Getting started is easy, even if the underlying masking has gaps.
10. Reputation, reliability & security — 5/10 (7%)
ixBrowser is younger and less mature than its competitors, and the absence of GPU masking is a known limitation that informed buyers will weigh. It works, but it has yet to establish a strong reputation for stealth reliability.
Who it’s for
Beginners and small, budget-conscious teams running low-stakes SMM and social media growth or light multi-accounting, who value a free tier with cloud storage and team features and whose use cases don’t demand top-tier masking. It’s a low-cost entry point into anti-detect browsing. Because there’s no GPU masking, it is not suited to serious anti-fraud niches like Facebook ad-account farming or high-stakes affiliate work.
Who should skip it
Anyone running high-stakes accounts or automation that depends on airtight fingerprints — the missing GPU masking is a real liability — and users who need to create large batches of profiles daily on the free plan. For more thorough masking at a still-accessible price, consider AdsPower or GoLogin.
FAQ
Is ixBrowser free? Yes — it offers a forever-free tier with unlimited total profiles, cloud storage and team work, though new profile creation is capped at 10 per day.
Does ixBrowser support automation? Automation and an API exist, but the experience is limited and clunky, and incomplete masking (no GPU masking) can hurt reliability.
Is ixBrowser good for budget multi-accounting? For low-stakes, budget multi-accounting it can work, but the missing GPU masking makes it a weaker choice where stealth really matters.
This review follows our evaluation methodology. Spotted outdated data? Submit a product update.
Reviewed by anonymous — independent anti-detect browser researcher. Affiliate disclosure: some links are partner links; this never affects our scores.
Scorecard
- Fingerprint masking20%5/10
- Pricing & value15%7/10
- Free plan & trial10%7/10
- Profiles & management10%7/10
- Automation & API10%5/10
- Team collaboration7%6/10
- Proxy & network8%7/10
- Cloud & mobile5%6/10
- Usability & UI8%7/10
- Reputation & security7%5/10
Ready to try ixBrowser?
Verify the latest pricing on the official site before you sign up — figures change often in this niche.
Visit ixBrowser →