Indigo Browser
Isolation-focused, but pricey and limited.
Last updated
Some links are affiliate linksPros
- Genuinely isolated profiles with dedicated proxies and cookies.
- Reliable fingerprint masking inherited from Multilogin-adjacent tech.
- Limited free tier lets you try before paying.
Cons
- Expensive: €99/mo for just 100 profiles, only a 25% annual discount.
- No mobile app, no web version, no cloud profile launch.
- Weak bulk actions — proxies are added one at a time.
- Heavy on manual work; automation is basic.
Indigo Browser review — capable isolation held back by manual workflows
TL;DR
Indigo Browser is a Chromium anti-detect tool with technical ties to Multilogin, run as a separate brand. It does the core job well — isolated profiles with their own proxies and cookies plus fingerprint masking — but it falls short on convenience. There’s no mobile app, no web version, no cloud launch, and bulk operations are clumsy, while the €99/mo entry price is high relative to what you get.
Pricing
| Plan | Price | Profiles | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | €0 | Limited | Trial-style limited tier |
| Paid (first tier) | €99/mo | 100 | ≈€891/yr with 25% annual discount |
Prices verified June 2026 — confirm on the official site.
How Indigo Browser scores on our criteria
1. Fingerprint masking quality — 7/10 (weight 20%)
Indigo masks fingerprints competently and isolates each profile with its own proxy and cookie set. Its technical lineage tied to Multilogin shows here: the masking is dependable for everyday multi-accounting. It doesn’t expose the deepest customization on the market, but the fundamentals are sound.
2. Pricing & value — 3/10 (15%)
This is Indigo’s biggest weakness. €99/mo for 100 profiles is steep, and the annual discount is a modest 25% (about €891/yr). Competitors offer more profiles, more features, or both at similar or lower prices, so value is poor.
3. Free plan & trial — 5/10 (10%)
There is a limited free tier, which is more than some rivals provide. It’s enough to evaluate the basics but constrained enough that serious testing requires moving to the paid plan quickly.
4. Profiles & management — 5/10 (10%)
Profiles are well isolated, but management is held back by weak bulk actions — proxies must be added one by one, and routine tasks involve a lot of manual clicking. For teams handling many accounts this friction adds up.
5. Automation & API — 4/10 (10%)
Automation is basic. Indigo supports some automation but lacks the robust, well-documented framework that automation-heavy users expect. If scripted, large-scale workflows are central to your operation, this will frustrate you.
6. Team collaboration — 5/10 (7%)
Indigo targets traffic-arbitrage teams and supports multi-user multi-accounting, but collaboration tooling is unremarkable and constrained by the same manual workflows that affect single users.
7. Proxy & network — 6/10 (8%)
Each profile can run its own proxy and the isolation is genuine, which is good. The catch is the workflow: proxies are added individually with no efficient bulk import, slowing setup for large profile counts.
8. Cloud & mobile profiles — 2/10 (5%)
There is no mobile app, no web version, and no cloud profile launch. Everything is tied to the desktop client, which is a clear limitation against browsers offering cloud or mobile profiles.
9. Usability & UI — 5/10 (8%)
The interface is serviceable, but the lack of bulk operations and the volume of manual steps undercut day-to-day usability. Power users will feel the missing automation and convenience features.
10. Reputation, reliability & security — 6/10 (7%)
Indigo benefits from its technical ties to Multilogin, which lends credibility on the masking and isolation side. As a separate brand it has a smaller footprint and less independent track record, but reliability is reasonable.
Who it’s for
Indigo suits media-buying and traffic-arbitrage teams, affiliate marketers, and Facebook ad-account farmers running aged or warmed accounts who value genuine profile isolation and trust the Multilogin-adjacent tech, and who can absorb the higher cost and manual workflows in exchange for dependable masking and ban evasion.
Who should skip it
Anyone who needs mobile profiles, cloud launch, strong automation, or efficient bulk operations should skip it. Cost-conscious users will also find better value elsewhere given the €99/mo floor — AdsPower delivers automation on all tiers at a fraction of the price, and Multilogin itself offers a more complete product for teams willing to pay for the category leader.
FAQ
Is Indigo Browser free? There is a limited free tier, but the first real paid plan costs €99/mo for 100 profiles.
Does Indigo Browser support automation? Only at a basic level — it lacks a robust automation framework for large-scale scripted workflows.
Is Indigo Browser good for traffic arbitrage? Yes, it is aimed at arbitrage and multi-accounting teams, provided you can work around the manual, no-bulk-action workflow.
This review follows our evaluation methodology. Spotted outdated data? Submit a product update.
Reviewed by anonymous — independent anti-detect browser researcher. Affiliate disclosure: some links are partner links; this never affects our scores.
Scorecard
- Fingerprint masking20%7/10
- Pricing & value15%3/10
- Free plan & trial10%5/10
- Profiles & management10%5/10
- Automation & API10%4/10
- Team collaboration7%5/10
- Proxy & network8%6/10
- Cloud & mobile5%2/10
- Usability & UI8%5/10
- Reputation & security7%6/10
Ready to try Indigo Browser?
Verify the latest pricing on the official site before you sign up — figures change often in this niche.
Visit Indigo Browser →